Beston Group

PPWR Enters General Application: Accelerating Waste Plastic Pyrolysis Oil toward High-Value Chemical Application

Beston Group — Fri, 28 Aug 2026 08:16:48 +0000

On August 12, 2026, the EU’s Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) enters general application. This marks a new stage for Europe’s packaging circularity system. The regulation pushes for less packaging, recyclable design, and recycled-content targets. Together, these will further speed up the upgrade of the global plastics circular supply chain. For the pyrolysis industry, demand for high-quality circular chemical feedstock is growing. As a result, the use of waste plastic pyrolysis oil is shifting. It is moving away from the traditional path of “waste plastic → pyrolysis oil (fuel)” and toward a closed-loop chain of “waste plastic → pyrolysis oil → high-value chemical feedstock → new materials”.

Interpreting PPWR Policy Signal: Impact on Pyrolysis Industry

Signal 1: Regulation Enters Unified Enforcement, Circularity Packaging System Speeds Up

As a regulation that directly applies across EU member states, rather than a directive requiring national transposition, PPWR’s general application will accelerate the establishment of a more unified packaging circular economy framework in Europe.

For the pyrolysis industry, this means the previous period of waiting and observing policy developments is gradually coming to an end. Supporting frameworks related to recycled content, chemical recycling recognition, and calculation methods are now moving toward further clarification.

Signal 2: Recycled Content Eligibility Rules Will Move from Uncertainty Toward Clear Standards

Under Article 7 of the PPWR (recycled content requirements), the European Commission will establish supporting rules, including methodologies for calculating and verifying recycled content, sustainability and recognition criteria for plastic chemical recycling technologies, and conditions for determining the equivalence of recycled materials from third countries.

This means whether waste plastic pyrolysis oil can be included in the EU-recognized chemical recycling recycled content system will become progressively clearer as the relevant rules are introduced.

Signal 3: The Compliance Preparation Window Is Narrowing, Requiring Earlier Industry Planning

From waste plastic pyrolysis oil production and advanced purification, to meeting petrochemical feedstock requirements and obtaining certifications such as ISCC PLUS, establishing a compliant circular feedstock supply chain requires significant time.

With PPWR entering general application, companies that begin technology upgrades, supply chain development, and certification preparation earlier will be better positioned to capture opportunities in the future circular raw material market.

From Fuel to Chemical Feedstock: The Value Upgrade of Plastic Pyrolysis Oil

Application Upgrading: From “Energy Recovery” to “Material Recycling”

Traditional Model (1.0 Era): Historically, due to limitations of pyrolysis oil quality and high purification costs, crude pyrolysis oil was primarily burned as an industrial fuel substitute. This model yields a short value chain and limited added value.
Upgraded Model (2.0 Era): Today, high-quality plastic pyrolysis oil is being repositioned as an alternative naphtha feedstock for steam crackers. After deep purification and refining, pyrolysis oil re-enters the primary petrochemical stream to yield basic chemicals (such as ethylene and propylene) and ultimately circular plastics—achieving a true “Plastic-to-Plastic” closed loop.

Price Logic Redefinition: From “Caloric Value Pricing” to “Circular Premium Pricing”

Fuel Route: When used as fuel, pyrolysis oil’s economic value is primarily determined by its heating value, with prices closely tied to traditional fuel markets. In Q2 2026, unrefined crude pyrolysis oil traded between $550 and $720 per ton.
Chemical Route: When entering the chemical supply chain, plastic pyrolysis oil gains stacked value from its circular attribute, carbon reduction impact, and regulatory compliance. ISCC PLUS-certified plastic pyrolysis oil helps petrochemical producers and brand owners meet recycled-content targets. According to market research, certified pyrolysis oil can achieve a premium of approximately $100-$200 per ton compared with conventional pyrolysis oil.

Industrial Continuous Pyrolysis Solution: Starting Point for High-Value Shift

To meet the latest industry development trends, Beston Group has developed the Blackgold P30 continuous pyrolysis system, providing technical support for integrating waste plastic pyrolysis oil into the circular chemical supply chain.

Industrial Continuous Operation

Ensure Oil Quality Consistency and Large-Scale Supply

The Blackgold P30 continuous pyrolysis plant uses continuous feeding and discharging technology combined with precise temperature control to achieve 30 days of continuous and stable operation, ensuring consistent pyrolysis oil quality. Meanwhile, the continuous production model enables large-scale capacity expansion and provides a foundation for meeting petrochemical companies’ demand for a stable supply of circular feedstocks.

Light and Heavy Oil Fractionation Technology

Enhance the Application Value of Pyrolysis Oil

The Blackgold P30 Continuous Pyrolysis System integrates fractionation technology at a key temperature range of approximately 200°C, allowing the direct separation of light oil and heavy oil fractions. After further purification and upgrading, the light oil fraction can serve as a circular chemical feedstock with properties close to naphtha, supporting downstream chemical applications. This approach helps reduce the investment in additional distillation equipment and shorten processing time.

Future Outlook

The transition toward the “waste plastic → high-value chemical feedstock → new materials” pathway is reshaping the feedstock supply landscape for the chemical industry. As PPWR’s supporting implementation rules are progressively rolled out between 2026 and 2030, market power will shift toward producers who can deliver stable, continuous, and ISCC PLUS-certified pyrolysis oil. Companies that proactively upgrade to industrial continuous technologies today will be uniquely positioned to capture high-value market share in this new era of chemical recycling.

The post PPWR Enters General Application: Accelerating Waste Plastic Pyrolysis Oil toward High-Value Chemical Application appeared first on Beston Group.

Core Technical Challenges of Biochar Application in Metallurgy

Beston Group — Wed, 19 Aug 2026 09:45:37 +0000

Biochar metallurgy is increasingly regarded as a key pathway for deep decarbonization in the metallurgical industry beyond 2030. By replacing fossil-based coke with sustainable biochar, it can potentially serve two critical functions: as a reducing agent and as a heat source. However, this is not a technology that can be rapidly deployed at scale. The industry often focuses heavily on pyrolysis technology while overlooking several equally critical factors: feedstock supply, quality standards, practical application, and system integration. These gaps can become major barriers to project operation and long-term scalability. This article explores 4 key technical challenges facing biochar metallurgy.

1. Biomass Feedstock Supply

Whether biochar can be used effectively and produced at scale depends first on the feedstock rather than biochar production equipment. If the feedstock is poorly selected or supply is unstable, even highly optimized process parameters cannot compensate for these limitations.

Feedstock Selection

The physicochemical properties of biomass feedstocks directly determine the performance that biochar can ultimately achieve. Four factors are particularly important:

Feedstock type: Biomass has different harvesting seasons and geographic distributions, which directly affect supply stability.
Moisture content: Higher moisture increases pre-drying energy consumption and causes fluctuations in product properties.
Ash content: Higher ash content increases impurity interference in the reactor, directly affecting the stability of metallurgical operations.
Lignocellulosic composition: Variations in lignocellulose content affect fixed carbon content and pore structure of biochar product.

Eucalyptus logs: A primary raw material for metallurgical biochar.

Therefore, it is difficult to consistently produce qualified metallurgical-grade biochar without strict feedstock control. This is why the availability and consistency of feedstock resources should be evaluated from the early stages of project development.

Large-Scale Feedstock Supply

The feedstock requirements of metal smelting are far greater than those of conventional biochar applications. The availability of regional biomass resources, reliable collection systems, and long-term supply capacity are widely recognized as major bottlenecks to large-scale adoption. However, 2 approaches to scaling up feedstock supply have already been demonstrated in the industry:

Aperam BioEnergia Eucalyptus Plantations in Brazil

Establishing dedicated plantations:

Aperam BioEnergia operates approximately 124,000 hectares of eucalyptus plantations in Brazil and produces more than 400,000 tons of charcoal annually. The charcoal is supplied to Aperam’s steel plant in the same state. However, the replicability of this model depends on whether a project developer has the capacity to secure and manage large areas of land. Its potential ecological impacts also need to be carefully assessed.

Exomad Green Concepción Site in Bolivia

Deploying projects near waste streams:

Our strategic partner Exomad Green in Bolivia uses residual materials from local sawmills as feedstock. Its project is located between the feedstock supply area and the biochar application area. The company plans to increase annual biochar production capacity to more than 400,000 tons by 2027. However, this pathway is currently focused on biochar CDR applications and has not yet been extended to metallurgical applications.

2. Standardization of Biochar for Metallurgical Applications

Lack of Standardized Biochar Quality Indicators

For years, the industry has relied primarily on fixed carbon content as the benchmark for biochar qualification. However, testing has shown that biochar with qualified fixed carbon content can still exhibit uneven reactions inside the furnace and cause unstable operating conditions. The performance of biochar in metallurgical applications is also determined by five often-overlooked indicators:

Microporous structure: Determines the contact area available for reactions between biochar and furnace gases.
Carbon microcrystalline structure: Affects the chemical reactivity of biochar at high temperatures.
Particle size and morphology: Influence the packing behavior of biochar after charging and the permeability of gas flow through the furnace.
Bulk density: Directly affects the effective carbon content per unit furnace volume and the rate of reduction reactions.
Inorganic ash content: Impurities in the ash can directly contribute to coking and corrosion problems inside the furnace.

Therefore, the quality evaluation system for metallurgical biochar needs to be comprehensively upgraded. Instead of relying solely on fixed carbon content, the evaluation should incorporate multiple dimensions, including high-temperature reactivity and dynamic reaction behavior inside the furnace.

Control of Pyrolysis Process Conditions

Key metallurgical biochar properties are not inherent characteristics of the biomass. They are directly influenced by pyrolysis system parameters. Comparative tests under different operating conditions show that three variables play a particularly important role:

Feedstock pretreatment:

Crushing and densification modify the physical form of the feedstock before pyrolysis. This physical restructuring optimizes the resulting pore structure and enhances high-temperature reduction reactivity, allowing the biochar to better meet the demanding requirements of metallurgical furnace conditions.

Reaction pressure and residence time:

Under normal operating ranges, increasing pressure and extending residence time significantly improve product yield and carbon conversion efficiency. Pushed to an extreme — high pressure combined with rapid heating — the same variables can fundamentally reshape the biochar’s microcrystalline structure.

The real challenge lies in standardizing the optimal combination of these parameters. Changes in feedstock batches or equipment configurations can significantly affect the process. The same parameter settings therefore cannot simply be transferred from one project to another. Targeted process testing and adjustment are required for each specific feedstock and equipment configuration.

3. Limitations in Practical Deployment

Even with clear quality indicators and optimized pyrolysis parameters, biochar still isn’t fully ready for metallurgical use. Several practical challenges remain.

Inherent Performance Limitations of Biochar

Compared with coke, conventional biochar has two inherent disadvantages:

Insufficient mechanical strength: Biochar can easily break down and become pulverized under the high-temperature and high-pressure conditions inside a furnace. This reduces furnace permeability and can compromise reaction stability.
Interference from ash and impurities: If ash from biomass feedstock enters the furnace directly, it can cause coking, corrosion, and unstable operating conditions. This can directly affect the purity of metallurgical products.

Cost of Upgrading and Modification

Densification, water washing for ash removal, and elemental doping are three key processes for improving the mechanical strength of biochar, reducing impurity content, and optimizing its high-temperature reaction performance. However, each process also introduces additional limitations:

Higher costs: Process upgrades can significantly increase production costs, creating a trade-off between performance and economic feasibility.
Process integration challenges: Adding these three processes requires production-line upgrades and places higher demands on the precision and sophistication of production management.

Storage and Logistics Management

Most projects concentrate resources on production equipment. However, storage and logistics are equally critical for preserving the metallurgical properties of biochar.

Biochar’s physical properties: Metallurgical-grade biochar typically has a highly porous structure, making it naturally prone to moisture absorption and breakage, which directly affect its performance once charged into the furnace.
Storage & logistics system requirements: A dedicated logistics system requires tailored solutions, from storage environment control to transportation methods. This is an additional investment that is easily overlooked.

4. System Integration with Metallurgical Plants

The optimal industrial model for biochar metallurgy in the future may not be to build standalone biochar production plants. Instead, biochar pyrolysis equipment could be integrated directly into metallurgical facilities. By recovering waste heat from metallurgical processes to power biochar production, this model could achieve energy integration and resource circularity. However, integrating metallurgical waste heat presents several challenges.

Waste Heat Matching

A pyrolysis unit already involves two heat sources: waste heat from pyrolysis flue gas and heat generated by combustible gas combustion. Once integrated into a metallurgical plant, these two heat sources must also be coordinated with the plant’s waste heat system. This adds another layer of complexity to heat matching.

Pyrolysis flue gas heat:

Both waste heat streams can be used to dry biomass feedstock. However, integrating them into the drying system requires dedicated piping infrastructure. Pipe routing, connection interfaces, and transmission distances all be reconfigured during engineering design.

Combustible gas heat:

Pyrolysis requires much tighter temperature control than feedstock drying. Determining how to proportion and regulate the two heat sources to maintain the precise temperature profile required for pyrolysis requires project-specific commissioning and optimization.

Equipment Modification

Combustible gas typically contains reducing and high-calorific-value components such as CH₄, CO, and H₂. Directly burning and discharging these gases without recovering their energy represents a waste of resources. Once external waste heat replaces part of the combustible gas combustion, the existing heating and recovery systems of the biochar production facility must be modified accordingly.

Combustion system modification:

The conventional direct-combustion heating system used in is not readily compatible with external waste heat. The heating system may need to be modified to a hot-air heating configuration, with precise air-flow regulation used to control the pyrolysis temperature.

Combustible gas system modification:

Recovering and utilizing combustible gas requires downstream facilities such as gas storage and power generation systems. The capacity specifications of these facilities must match the combustible gas output of the production facility to establish a complete energy recovery chain.

Biochar is Reshaping the Decarbonization Path for Metallurgy Industries

Biochar metallurgy is not an isolated technical improvement. It is a key pathway for the steel industry to achieve deep decarbonization beyond 2030. Whether this pathway can truly be scaled and replicated does not depend on a breakthrough in any single process parameter, but on whether the entire industry chain can mature in a coordinated way. For the industry, now is the window to act. If you’re interested in metallurgical biochar production solutions, feel free to contact us.

The post Core Technical Challenges of Biochar Application in Metallurgy appeared first on Beston Group.

Technical Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Thermal Desorption Technologies for Soil/Oil Sludge Treatment

Beston Group — Tue, 18 Aug 2026 09:40:40 +0000

Contaminated soil and oil sludge management is a critical priority under strict ESG standards. While thermal desorption technology offers the industry-standard solution, performance varies across three primary configurations: ex-situ direct heating, in-situ indirect heating, and ex-situ indirect heating. So, how do you evaluate these options to choose the right TDU for your project?

Ex-situ Indirect Heating Thermal Desorption

Ex-situ indirect heating thermal desorption is an environmental remediation technology designed for high-value hydrocarbon recovery and soil decontamination, which heats excavated contaminated soil or oil sludge through reactor surfaces in an oxygen-deprived environment using indirectly heated rotary kilns or thermal screw.

Beston Group’s Indirect Thermal Desorption Unit in Africa (Taken on December 30, 2025)

Application Site

Designed for centralized, off-site plant processing of heavily contaminated organic waste.

Deployment Mode: Ex-situ Treatment
Target Material: Industrial Oil Sludge / Drill Cuttings / Oil-contaminated soil
Project Feature: Centralized Plant Processing / High-Value Recovery.

Technical Principle & Operational Process

Indirect thermal conduction: Uses fuel burners to heat a transfer medium (hot oil, molten salt, or steam) or reactor shell, achieving zero direct contact between combustion flue gases and process feedstock.
Controlled pyrolytic separation: Sealed reactor or hollow augers continuously tumble and heat material, vaporizing organic contaminants (such as TPH and PAHs) from the solid matrix into isolated, low-volume process vapors for high-purity oil condensation.

Primary Output & Resource Recovery Potential

Remediation output: Delivers fully decontaminated, clean solids meeting strict environmental standards while minimizing downstream off-gas treatment loading.
Resource recovery: Condenses clean, high-purity pyrolysis oil fractions that can be directly commercialized or reused as industrial fuel.

Technical Limitations

Pre-treatment mandate: Requires upstream excavation, sorting, and feedstock pre-treatment before material can enter the sealed pyrolysis reactor.
Strict engineering demands: Imposes stringent requirements on dynamic reactor sealing and corrosion-resistant metallurgy under operation.

Ex-situ Direct Heating Thermal Desorption

Ex-situ direct heating thermal desorption is an environmental remediation technique that applies direct thermal energy to excavated soils, typically utilizing primary treatment units such as direct-fired rotary kilns, aggregate dryers, or conveyor furnaces.

Application Site

Designed for off-site soil treatment requiring high-volume processing and rapid turnover.

Deployment Mode: Ex-situ Treatment
Target Material: Excavated Contaminated Soil / Aggregates
Project Scale: Large-Scale / High-Throughput Engineering

Technical Principle & Operational Process

Direct thermal agitation: Utilizes fuel burners or radiation sources to heat feedstock while revolving drums with internal flights or belts tumble material to ensure maximum direct flame/gas exposure.
Thermal volatilization & separation: Elevated temperatures rapidly vaporize organic contaminants from the solid soil matrix into a gaseous phase, which is continuously swept out of the heating chamber by flue gases for treatment.

Primary Output & Resource Recovery Potential

Remediation output: Yields clean, fully decontaminated soil and solid aggregates compliant with environmental standards.
Recovery limitation: Focuses entirely on soil volume reduction and lacks mechanisms to extract or recover refined oil products.

Technical Limitations

High flue-gas load: Direct mixing of combustion gases and process vapors generates massive off-gas volumes, straining downstream treatment systems.
Operational explosion hazard: Direct contact between volatile organics and open flames creates significant explosion risks.

In-situ Indirect Heating Thermal Desorption

In-situ indirect heating thermal desorption is a non-excavation soil remediation technology that applies subsurface heat to vaporize organic pollutants in place, typically utilizing treatment systems such as electrical thermal wells, thermal blanket systems, or steam/hot-air injection wells.

Application Site

Designed for on-site soil remediation without requiring excavation.

Deployment Mode: In-situ Treatment
Target Area: Shallow-to-Deep Soil / Active Industrial Sites / Land Beneath Infrastructure
Project Feature: Non-Excavation / Minimal Surface Topology Disruption

Technical Principle & Operational Process

Subsurface thermal conduction: Injects steam/hot air or utilizes mechanical/electrical heaters installed in vertical wells or blankets to heat contaminated soil through conduction and radiation.
In-place volatilization & extraction: Elevated temperatures volatilize organic contaminants (including volatile and semi-volatile compounds), which are then collected under vacuum via surface shrouds or extraction wells for above-ground treatment.

Primary Output & Resource Recovery Potential

Remediation output: Successfully remediates soil in place while yielding extracted volatile organic gases for localized filtering or scrubbing.
Recovery limitation: Focuses primarily on contaminant extraction and destruction, lacking mechanisms to collect commercial-grade oil products.

Technical Limitations

Low conduction efficiency: Slow subsurface heat transfer prolongs treatment cycles and drives up power consumption.
Geological sensitivity: Non-uniform soil composition blocks even heat flow, creating unheated zones and risking incomplete local remediation.

Technical Comparison Table for Thermal Desorption Unit Selection

To help you quickly evaluate the most suitable technology for your specific soil or oil sludge remediation requirements, the table below provides a side-by-side comparison across key operational, safety, and financial dimensions.

Key Selection Criteria	Ex-situ Sealed Indirect Heating TDU	Ex-situ Direct Heating TDU	In-situ Indirect Heating TDU
Application Scenario	Centralized oil sludge & drill cuttings plants	Large-scale excavated soil projects	Non-excavation / Deep soil & urban sites
Heat Transfer Method	Indirect shell conduction (zero flue gas contact)	Direct flame/gas contact	Subsurface thermal conduction
Safety & Explosion Risk	Very Low (sealed, oxygen-deprived)	High (flame contacts organic vapor)	Low to Moderate
Off-Gas Treatment Scale	Minimal (isolated process vapor)	Massive (high tail-gas system cost)	Moderate (vacuum extraction stream)
Pyrolysis Oil Recovery	Yes (High-Purity / High-Value)	No (thermal oxidation)	No (highly diluted vapor)
Primary Project Goal	Maximized ROI via high-purity oil recovery	Rapid soil decontamination & volume reduction	Remediation without surface disruption

Conclusion

Each thermal desorption technology serves specific remediation needs. While direct and in-situ systems excel in rapid soil cleanup or non-excavation scenarios, ex-situ sealed indirect heating TDU systems are the best choice for investors seeking high ROI through valuable pyrolysis oil recovery. Looking for the optimal equipment configuration? Contact Beston Group today to receive customized engineering solutions and expert consultation for your project.

The post Technical Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Thermal Desorption Technologies for Soil/Oil Sludge Treatment appeared first on Beston Group.

Turning Waste Plastic Into Fuel: BLJ-16 Plastic Pyrolysis Plant Delivered in Europe

Beston Group — Fri, 14 Aug 2026 01:46:05 +0000

Plastic pyrolysis project achieves new progress in Europe! A set of BLJ-16 plastic pyrolysis plant has successfully completed installation and commissioning. Beston Group’s installation team received the acceptance sign-off from the European customer. The project is dedicated to converting the customer’s daily industrial plastic waste into high-value fuel oil. The oil will later be used for power generation, helping the customer reduce electricity costs in daily operations. Below are photos and details from the installation site:

BLJ-16 Plastic Pyrolysis Plant Successfully Delivered in Europe (Credit: Beston Group)

Project Background: From Waste Challenge to Energy Integration

The customer operates in the renewable energy sector in Europe and has maintained stable cooperation with Chinese suppliers for many years. The project addressed two pressing challenges the customer faced, and the benefits plastic pyrolysis brought in response.

Waste Plastic Pile at Customer’s Site

What the Customer Faced:

Environmental pressure: Daily operations generate a steady volume of PP and PET waste plastic packaging, accumulating on site and requiring an urgent, sustainable disposal solution.
Energy shortage: Local electricity prices are high, particularly in winter, when the customer’s business — which mainly covers demand through summer power — faces a persistent energy gap.

BLJ-16 Plastic Pyrolysis Plant Under Installation

What Plastic Pyrolysis Delivered:

Waste-to-fuel conversion: Pyrolysis converts waste plastics into fuel oil. Combined with future power generation facilities, it can help offset the customer’s winter electricity shortage.
Reliable feedstock supply: Waste plastics and end-of-life tires are available locally at low cost, serving as supplementary feedstock for stable, long-term operation.

After a comprehensive technical and economic evaluation, the European customer selected the BLJ-16 plastic pyrolysis plant, configured with a single manifold, hydraulic feeding system, and steam boiler.

Challenges and Solutions: Rapid On-Site Response to Critical Issues

The plastic to oil machine was installed on-site by the customer’s own team. Beston Group then dispatched installation engineer to support equipment commissioning and trial production, ensuring the project reached full operation.

Challenge 1: Pressure Surge in Commissioning

Solution: The engineer traced the issue to water accumulation in the piping, which had disabled the afterburner’s gas burner. Once cleared, trial production proceeded as planned.

Challenge 2: Water Seal Installation Dispute

Solution: The engineer inspected the water seal piping directly, confirmed the installation error, and guided the customer through the correction.

BLJ-16 During Hydraulic Feeding

BLJ-16 awaiting solid residue discharge

Results and Customer Feedback

Following the troubleshooting of the pressure surge and water seal issues, BLJ-16 pyrolysis plant entered formal trial production. The Beston engineer continued on-site monitoring to verify stable operation and performance. The trial was completed successfully, leading to on-site acceptance by the customer.

Trial Production Results

The customer fed approximately 2.2 tons of baled and rolled waste plastic in a single batch. The recovered fuel oil ignited readily and burned steadily during testing. The solid residue also showed no obvious signs of unpyrolyzed feedstock.

Customer Acceptance

On-site commissioning was completed in 15 days, in line with the original project timeline. The customer completed the on-site acceptance and formally signed off on the project, confirming that the system met the agreed commissioning requirements.

From Waste to Value: Get Your Plastic Pyrolysis Solution

With plastic waste disposal regulations becoming increasingly stringent worldwide, this European project demonstrates the potential of pyrolysis as a practical waste-to-energy solution. By converting plastic waste into fuel oil, the project not only addresses the challenge of daily waste disposal but also helps alleviate the customer’s persistent energy shortage. Since every customer’s waste stream, feedstock availability, and end-product utilization needs are different, Beston Group provides tailored plastic pyrolysis solutions based on specific project requirements.

The post Turning Waste Plastic Into Fuel: BLJ-16 Plastic Pyrolysis Plant Delivered in Europe appeared first on Beston Group.

Blackgold P30 Official Launch Event

Beston Group — Fri, 24 Jul 2026 01:00:24 +0000

Coming October 2026

Blackgold P30 Launch Event

On October 15, 2026, Beston Group will unveil a global breakthrough in continuous pyrolysis — “Blackgold P30” — in Zhengzhou, Henan, China. We cordially invite you as our honored guest to witness the new era in continuous pyrolysis technology.

Become a Participant

DATEOct 15, 2026

LOCATIONZhengzhou, Henan, CN

FormatLive Plant Demo

400_{Million Tons}Plastic Waste
Generated Globally
Every Year

1.5-2_BillionEnd-Of-Life Tires
Discarded Annually

Pyrolysis has become the inevitable path to waste-to-resource conversion. However, the industry still faces four core critical challenges:

Wax Oil Clogging

Wax oil buildup leads to plugging and unstable operation.

Frequent Downtime

Unplanned shutdowns reduce productivity and increase costs.

Coking

Carbon deposits affect efficiency, yield, and equipment lifespan.

Environmental Compliance

Stricter emission rules require better environmental performance

Meet the Next-Generation Blackgold P30

Min Manual Labor

Oil Quality Upgrading

0 Clogging; Minimal Coking

100% Compliance

Tire Rubber Granules

Plastic Pellets

High Quality Fuel Oil

What Awaits You at the Launch Event?

See It Run Live

Witness the full P30 operation process (continuous feeding – pyrolysis –
continuous oil output) live on site. And verify real-time oil yield and
product indicators for yourself.

Experience Next-Generation Automation

Watch our fully automated intelligent control system in action. See how
it minimizes manual intervention, reduces energy consumption, and
ensures full compliance.

Dive Deep into the Core Breakthroughs

Our Chief Engineer will break down P30’s latest advances in wax-blockage
prevention, anti-coking design, oil quality upgrading, and safety sealing
— and show you what 24/7 continuous, high-safety operation really looks like.

Explore the Industry’s Future With Experts

Industry-leading experts will guide you through the latest trends and
market outlook for chemical recycling of waste tires and plastics.

Event Agenda

TIME	ITEM	SPEAKER
AGENDA OF DAY ONE (15 OCTOBER 2026)
08:20–09:20	Registration
09:20–09:25	Welcome Address	Henry He, CEO of Beston
09:25–10:10	Blackgold P30 Introduction	Henry He, CEO of Beston
09:25–10:10	The Solution of Collecting Excess Pyrolysis Gas to Convert Gasoline Blending Components	Henry He, CEO of Beston
10:10–10:40	Q&A	Engineer Feng, Product Manager
10:40–11:10	Coffee Break
11:10–12:00	Industry Experts Sharing & Customer Case Sharing and Interaction
11:20–13:30	Networking Lunch
13:00–15:10	Move to Beston Factory
15:20–16:20	Factory Visit
16:20–18:00	Blackgold P30 Introduction Demonstration & Live Equipment Showcase	Mark Zhang, Project Consultant
16:20–18:00	Excess Pyrolysis Gas to Convert Gasoline Blending Components Introduction Demonstration & Live Equipment Showcase	Mark Zhang, Project Consultant
18:00–18:30	Signing Ceremony for New Product Launch	Henry He, CEO of Beston
18:30–18:40	Closing Speech and Wrap-up	Henry He, CEO of Beston
20:10–22:00	Thank-You Dinner	All
AGENDA OF DAY TWO (16 OCTOBER 2026)
08:30–14:00 Option1	Shaolin Temple Half-day Tour Visit the birthplace of Shaolin Kungfu, enjoy Kung Fu performance, and experience Zen Buddhist cultural heritage. (Voluntary participation)
09:00–18:00 Option2	One-on-one Exclusive Technical & Business Communication

Moments from Previous Exchange Conferences

A series of Beston pyrolysis technical exchange events have consistently appealed to global industry leaders across the solid waste recycling sector. We gathered to discuss the latest technical innovations and foster deep collaboration.

“That was a very valuable experience. We learned a lot about the equipment, the processes, and the startup.”

Rimvydas MatijošaitisCEO · Energy Industry · Europe

“Seeing the equipment running in person gave us a completely different perspective. We left with a much clearer plan for the next phase. Thank you for your explanation, thank you for your hospitality.”

Mortaza AghbashloProfessor · Energy Resources Sector · Middle East

Secure Your Participation

We sincerely invite you once again to join Blackgold P30 official Launch Event. The Blackgold P30 represents more than just a technological breakthrough in tire and plastic waste recycling — it is a commitment to a cleaner, more efficient, and sustainable future. Together, let’s unlock the hidden value in waste and lead the industry into new era of continuous pyrolysis.

[contact-form-7]

The post Blackgold P30 Official Launch Event appeared first on Beston Group.

Beston Group Becomes Rainbow Partner for Industrial Pyrolysis Manufacturers

Beston Group — Thu, 23 Jul 2026 06:25:26 +0000

Big news for the biochar carbon removal industry! Beston BST-50 and BST-06Quicker models have been vetted under Rainbow’s Biomass Carbon Removal and Storage (BiCRS) V1.1 methodology. Beston Group has officially become one of the first Industrial Pyrolysis Manufacturers in the Rainbow Partner Program. This milestone collaboration gives developers under the Rainbow Standard a proven technology pathway. They can now choose either model for biochar carbon removal projects implementation.

2 Rainbow Vetted Biochar Production Equipment Models

BST-50: Industrial-scale

Continuous operation: Guarantees 7200+ hours of annual continuous operation
Biochar Output: Produce 5,400+ tonnes of biochar per year at 5% moisture content (wet basis)

Download Vetting Decision

BST-06Quicker: Pilot-scale

Quick-installation and lightweight design: 8-hour rapid installation and deployment
Movable design: Quickly disassemble and redeploy to a new production site.

Download Vetting Decision

Together, the two models allow developers to move from concept validation to commercial-scale production on a single Rainbow-endorsed technology pathway. Beston Group will host the BST-06Quicker Global Launch Event on October 15, 2026, formally introducing the pilot-scale machine to the biochar CDR industry.

What Rainbow Endorsed Equipment Brings to CDR Project Developers?

Getting a biochar CDR project from equipment selection to its first issued carbon credit involves several steps — technical assessment, compliance review, and certification documentation. Rainbow endorsed Beston equipment helps developers move through this process more smoothly:

Lower Risk

Using endorsed biochar machine, developers can skip the technology verification step, thereby reducing uncertainty regarding technology compliance.

Faster Certification

Rainbow-endorsed equipment can be put into production faster, saving some approval time. Thus, it accelerates project certification and credit issuance.

Less Time Wasted

Without the need for lengthy market research, developers can directly select from the Rainbow vetted device list, saving project startup time.

Looking Ahead

Becoming a Rainbow Partner, Beston Group takes another step forward in supporting biochar carbon removal developers. With the BST-06Quicker and BST-50 covering pilot validation and industrial-scale production, developers can access a clearer path from initial testing to commercial deployment under the Rainbow Standard. Beston Group will continue to provide reliable pyrolysis equipment and tailored solutions to help developers bring biochar carbon removal projects into operation.

The post Beston Group Becomes Rainbow Partner for Industrial Pyrolysis Manufacturers appeared first on Beston Group.

Waste Tires into Fuel Oil: African Pyrolysis + Distillation Project Powers Factory Fuel Self-Sufficiency

Beston Group — Thu, 23 Jul 2026 02:19:15 +0000

A major step forward in East Africa’s circular economy! A waste tire pyrolysis plant and a set of oil distillation equipment were successfully installed and commissioned in East Africa under the technical guidance of Beston Group. This project processes 8–10 tons of end-of-life tire waste daily into fuel oil, which enables the client to achieve industrial energy self-sufficiency while creating an extra commercial revenue stream.

Stage 1: Crude Tyre Pyrolysis Oil

Stage 2: Light Distillate Oil

Stage 2: Heavy Distillate Oil

Project Background: Breaking Free from Rising Energy Costs

The client owns and operates multiple industrial factories in the local region. As business operations continued to expand, the demand for industrial fuel across various production lines kept rising. High and persistent energy costs had become a core issue constraining overall profitability. Recognizing that tire pyrolysis oil could serve as a cost-effective alternative fuel, the client invested in this tire-to-energy project to significantly cut fuel expenses.

Stockpiled end-of-life tires at the site in East Africa (October 2025).

Shredded waste tire strips loaded into pyrolysis reactor.

Solution: Tire Pyrolysis + Distillation

Based on in-depth communication with the client, we designed a customized solution with a processing capacity of 8-10 tons per day, consisting of one tyre pyrolysis unit and one distillation unit.

1. 8-10 TPD Tyre Pyrolysis Plant

End-of-life tires are efficiently processed into pyrolysis oil, carbon black, and steel wire. The system features an advanced reactor design, a efficient condensing system for maximum oil recovery, an advanced flue gas purification unit for environmental compliance, and a water-cooling discharging system to ensure safe operations.

Processing capacity: 8-10 tons waste tires
Configuration: Standard configuration
Output: Crude tyre pyrolysis oil

2. BZJ-10 Distillation Equipment

The crude pyrolysis oil is fed directly into the distillation system, where precise temperature control separates it into light oil and heavy oil.

Output 1: Heavy Distilled Oil (Fractionated at 250–280°C)

With high calorific value, heavy oil will be used as alternative industrial fuels in the client’s own factories to reduce factory energy expenses.

Output 2: Light Distilled Oil (Fractionated at <250°C)

With lower impurity content, light oil will be sold into the local market to create new revenue stream that accelerates ROI.

8-10 TPD waste tire pyrolysis plant successfully installed in east africa, awaiting official operation. (Credit: beston group)

Dedusting System Installation

Pyrolysis Reactor Installation

Pyrolysis Reactor and Oil Storage Tank Installed in Installation

Condensing System Installation

Results and Long-Term Value

After installation and commissioning, the system run smoothly and its oil yield satisfies expected standards. Self-sufficiency in fuel oil sinificantly reduce the client’s overall fuel procurement costs across its factories by more than 30%.

For energy-intensive industries, the value of such a tire pyrolysis recycling project goes far beyond “eco-friendly processing waste tires.” It offers a practical path to lowering costs, stabilizing fuel supply, and even generating incremental revenue. This is also why we continue to provide sustainable pyrolysis solutions to clients around the world.

The post Waste Tires into Fuel Oil: African Pyrolysis + Distillation Project Powers Factory Fuel Self-Sufficiency appeared first on Beston Group.

BST-06Quicker Official Launch Event

Beston Group — Mon, 20 Jul 2026 04:09:11 +0000

BST-06Quicker Official Launch Event

To explore new possibilities in biomass carbon removal and accelerate the adoption of innovative solutions, Beston Group is hosting the official launch event of BST-06Quicker on 15th, October.

Join industry professionals, partners, and experts to witness the unveiling of our latest innovation, exchange insights, and explore future opportunities in the evolving carbonization market.

Become a Participant!

Key Challenges in BCDR Exploration

High initial investment, lengthy validation processes, and operational complexity remain key challenges for carbonization projects. Beston introduces BST-06Quicker to provide a more flexible approach for exploring BCDR opportunities and accelerating project validation.

Uncertain Project Feasibility

Businesses often hesitate to make large-scale investments without first validating project potential.

Long Time from Planning to Operation

Long preparation and deployment cycles can slow down project validation and development.

Meeting Carbon Project Requirements

Long preparation and deployment cycles can slow down project validation and development.

Empowering BCDR: The Grand Debut of BST-06Quicker

Join us as Beston officially unveils BST-06Quicker, a new-generation carbonization solution designed to support businesses exploring BCDR opportunities!

Common Concerns from Investors:

Want to enter the BCDR market but unsure whether the project is worth investing in?

Worried about waiting too long before the project starts operating?

Worried that biochar quality may not meet project requirements?

BST-06Quicker

Enable small-scale validation to reduce initial investment risks

Continuous operationLow investment costMeets certification requirements

8-hour rapid installation and deployment for faster project setup

High-quality biochar production to meet EBC standards

Why This Launch Matters?

Witness the BST-06Quicker Official Launch:

Be the first to discover BST-06Quicker and witness the debut of Beston’s latest innovation in carbonization technology.

Gain cutting-edge industry insights

Listen to industry experts share the latest trends, market opportunities, and future directions in the carbonization industry.

Connect & Explore Cooperation Opportunities:

Exchange ideas with industry professionals, potential partners, and innovative companies to explore future cooperation opportunities.

Experience the Carbonization Process Firsthand:

Experience the complete carbonization process firsthand, from biomass feedstock input to high-quality biochar production through live equipment operation.

Event Agenda

TIME	ITEM	SPEAKER
WELCOME DINNER (14 OCTOBER 2026)
19:30–22:00	Open exclusively to invited customers
AGENDA OF DAY ONE (15 OCTOBER 2026)
08:30–09:00	Registration
09:00–09:10	Welcome Address	Henry He, CEO of Beston
09:10–09:40	BST–06Quicker Introduction	Matt Zhang, Marketing Director of Beston
09:40–10:10	The Beston dMV Solution	Offstream or Crystalchain
10:10–10:40	Coffee Break
10:40–11:10	Biochar CDR Certification Process and Timeline	Isometric or Rainbow or Puro.earth (TBD)
11:10–11:40	Q&A	All
11:40–13:00	Networking Lunch
13:00–14:20	Move to Beston Factory
14:20–15:20	Factory Visit
15:20–17:20	BST–06Quicker Demonstration & Live Equipment Showcase	Mia, Project Consultant
17:20–18:00	Customer Case Sharing and Interaction	TBD
18:00–18:20	C10K Site Visit	Ethan, Project Manager
18:20–18:30	Closing Speech and Wrap-up	Henry He, CEO of Beston
19:00–21:30	Thank-You Dinner
AGENDA OF DAY TWO (16 OCTOBER 2026)
08:30–14:00	Shaolin Temple Half-day Tour Visit the birthplace of Shaolin Kungfu, enjoy Kung Fu performance, and experience Zen Buddhist cultural heritage. (Voluntary participation)

Detailed Event Information

Strategic partner of Exomad, the world’s largest carbon sink supplier.

Technology partners of Puro.earth & Isometric

100+ Countries Installation Sites

Date:October 15, 2026

Location:Beston Factory, Zhengzhou City, China

Book a seat now!

[contact-form-7]

The post BST-06Quicker Official Launch Event appeared first on Beston Group.

Feedstock Contaminant Limits for Plastic Pyrolysis: Key Data Shared from AEPW Guidelines

Beston Group — Fri, 17 Jul 2026 02:59:23 +0000

Source Attribution & Disclaimer: The technical metrics in this article are objectively compiled and adapted from the global report “Feedstock Quality Guidelines for Pyrolysis of Plastic Waste” published by the Alliance to End Plastic Waste (AEPW) and Eunomia Research & Consulting (August 2022). This article is intended solely as a non-commercial technical reference and industry knowledge-sharing resource for global partners in the chemical recycling sector, and shall not be used for any commercial resale or profit-making purposes. Readers are highly encouraged to visit the official AEPW Report Page or the website of Eunomia Report Page to access the full text of the original report.

1. Why Develop this Pyrolysis Feedstock Guideline?

1.1 Global Context: Rise of Chemical Recycling

Stakeholder groups ranging from packaging manufacturers to government agencies are interested in the potential of advanced recycling to add new dimensions to plastic waste recycling, particularly with expectations that the technologies will complement mechanical recycling. Among various chemical recycling pathways, pyrolysis plays a leading role in build a closed-loop plastic circular system. Through thermal depolymerisation, waste plastics are converted into naphtha, which can then re-enter plastic production chains.

1.2 Core Challenge: Lack of Uniform Feedstock Standards

Rapid expansion of the pyrolysis sector has laid bare a fundamental industry challenge: the long-standing absence of unified quality specifications for feedstock.

For waste sorting operators: Sorting facilities are accustomed to feedstock specifications for mechanical plastic recycling. They lack clear guidance on preparing qualified mixed plastic feedstock for pyrolysis plants.
For pyrolysis equipment suppliers and plant operators: Uncertain feedstock composition can cause undesirable effects including lowered process yield, reduced output quality, and wear on equipment, which all add cost burdens.

1.3 Objective of the Guideline

To address these issues, AEPW and Eunomia jointly developed this report. The purpose of this study is to help to provide clarity around the input feedstock requirements for pyrolysis and to propose a model feedstock specification that can be used as a starting point for discussions between pyrolysis operators and material suppliers.

2. Pyrolysis Feedstock Specification

Main Composition	Minimum Threshold/Contamination Limit	Potential Impact and Process Limitation Explanation
PE and PP Content	≥ 85%	Polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) are the principal desired feedstock of pyrolysis operators. Lower portions of combined PE and PP content in feedstock generally mean higher presence of heteroatoms5 such as oxygen and nitrogen. A high heteroatom content might lead to lower yield and/or the need for post-process hydrotreating to meet the offtake specifications which has economic implications on the process.
PVC / PVDC Content	≤ 1%	Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polyvinylidene chloride (PVDC) films introduce chlorine atoms into the pyrolysis process, which can cause corrosion to equipment and persist into the finished hydrocarbon product as heteroatoms. Pyrolysis operators have limited cost-effective means of removing PVC/PVDC or circumventing the challenges it poses.
PET / EVOH / Nylon Content	≤ 5%	Polyethylene terephthalate (PET), ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH), and nylon are problematic contaminants because they contain molecules that include oxygen and more complex hydrogen-carbon structures. The presence of oxygen atoms in the feedstock results in oxygenated products, which reduces yield and negatively impact the quality of pyrolysis oil. Some more complex hydrogen-carbon structures, such as nylon and PET do not break down as easily as those of PE and PP, and some by-products of their decomposition will act as impurities in the finished product.
PS Content	≤ 7%	Polystyrene (PS) is generally not viewed as a prohibitive contaminant. Nonetheless, individual operator tolerances for PS may vary significantly. Some operators expressed very loose thresholds for maximum PS content, while others indicated tighter thresholds that still may be within the expected range for PS occurrence in mixed plastic feedstock streams.
Metal / Glass / Dirt / Fines Content	≤ 7%	This family of contaminants is problematic for two reasons. First, these materials tend to be abrasive and can significantly damage equipment. Second, they are relatively heavy, which increases cost burden to pyrolysis operators—since input feedstock is typically purchased on a per-unit-weight basis.
Paper / Organics Content	≤ 10%	Paper and other organic materials containing oxygen and more complex molecule structures which may reduce the quality of the end product. This may increase post-treatment requirements and cost such as hydroprocessing. Operators indicated a fairly broad range of thresholds for these materials, with some operators expressing a relatively relaxed limit. These thresholds may be correlated with pre-sorting technologies.
Maximum Water Content	≤ 7%	Water absorbs reaction heat and increases energy consumption. Although it can be removed through pretreatment drying, excessive moisture increases investment and operating costs.
Maximum Total Ash Content	≤ 15%	Provided that individual impurity components do not exceed their respective limits, the combined total ash content shall not exceed 15%.

3. Drivers that Determine the Feedstock Specification

Image Source: Alliance to End Plastic Waste (AEPW) & Eunomia. Adapted from “Feedstock Quality Guidelines for Pyrolysis of Plastic Waste” (Figure 2.2).

Front-End Pre-Sorting Capability

More Pre-sorting → Less Prescriptive Feedstock Standards: Plastic pyrolysis plants equipped with robust sorting system (e.g., optical sorters, magnetic separators) can accept lower-grade, highly mixed plastic waste, since the sorting system filters out PVC, PET, and other unsuitable materials.
Less Pre-sorting → More Prescriptive Feedstock Standards: If lacking robust sorting lines, pyrolysis plant operators must purchase expensive clean plastic waste to avoid reactor damage and compromised oil quality

Back-End Post-Treatment Configuration

More Post-treatment → Less Prescriptive Feedstock Standards: With advanced refining system (catalytic, de-chlorination, distillation), pyrolysis plant operatiors has a much higher tolerance of contaminants (like chlorine and silicon) in the raw plastic. Since impurities in oil can be refined out later.
Less Post-treatment → More Prescriptive Feedstock Standards: With basic or simplified purification, there’s little room for error. Feedstock impurities must be tightly controlled upfront to ensure the output oil meets basic market standards.

Downstream Offtaker Specifications

Less Restrictive Offtaker Specs → Less Prescriptive Feedstock Standards: If your downstream buyer (offtaker) only requires low-grade pyrolysis oil for industrial heating, marine fuel, or basic blending, your feedstock input requirements can be significantly relaxed.
More Restrictive Offtaker Specs → More Prescriptive Feedstock Standards: If your goal is to sell premium pyrolysis oil to petrochemical giants (like Dow, BASF, or Shell) for circular plastics (steam crackers), their chemical-grade specifications are extremely tight. To meet their standard, your input plastics must be virtually free of PVC, halogen, and metals.

Value Equation & Cost-Revenue Model

Lower Cost/Revenue → Less Prescriptive Feedstock Standards: In regions with low processing costs, high gate fees (tipping fees), or where the revenue model leans heavily on government waste treatment subsidies rather than oil sales, the plant can tolerate a wider, less-prescriptive range of low-quality waste.
Higher Cost/Revenue → More Prescriptive Feedstock Standards: When high-purity pyrolysis oil commands a massive premium (high revenue), or when operational and purification costs are extremely high, it becomes highly profitable to use precise, high-quality feedstock specifications to maximize high-value oil yield and minimize equipment downtime.

Concluding Remarks

The pyrolysis of waste plastics (advanced recycling) is a rigorous science where “Input Dictates Output.” By understanding this international feedstock quality guide, global customers can, when conducting project feasibility studies and equipment procurement, more scientifically align local waste plastic composition and economics to customize the most efficient, stable, and commercially profitable pyrolysis solution.

The post Feedstock Contaminant Limits for Plastic Pyrolysis: Key Data Shared from AEPW Guidelines appeared first on Beston Group.

Biomass Pyrolysis to Biochar Test Reports

Beston Group — Wed, 15 Jul 2026 09:13:22 +0000

Beston Group’s laboratory regularly conducts pyrolysis tests on different types of biomass feedstock to verify equipment performance and evaluate biochar quality. This page presents real test data from our lab, including process parameters and basic physicochemical properties of the resulting biochar. The data is updated regularly as new tests are completed, giving you a general reference for how different feedstocks behave during pyrolysis. Before reviewing the specific data, please note the following points to help you interpret and use these results more accurately.

General Notes of Test Report Data

Comparability of Results:

Results for the same feedstock type may vary depending on variety, origin, physical form (pellet/powder/chunk), and pre-treatment. The data shown here reflects only the specific sample tested and should not be taken as a fixed value for that feedstock category in general.

Lab Results vs. Industrial Operation:

The data comes from small-scale laboratory equipment under ideal conditions. However, industrial-scale equipment subjects to interfering factors. Thus, this data is for reference only and does not represent a performance guarantee for full-scale equipment.

Note on Wood Vinegar & Tar Yield:

They are measured using a laboratory condensation setup. Industrial-scale operation combusts wood vinegar & tar directly as syngas for process heating. This yield data is intended to illustrate the mass balance of the reaction, not collected in actual production.

Scope of Testing:

The data comes from our laboratory only covers basic indicators. For more in-depth quality or safety parameters, such as H/C molar ratio, PAHs, or heavy metal content, samples should be sent to a qualified third-party laboratory for testing under recognized standards.

EFB Fiber Pyrolysis to Biochar Test on 2026-05-14

EFB Fiber

Test Report of Experimental Process

Material Weight	120 g
Pyrolysis Time	3 hours 3 minutes
Maximum Pyrolysis Temperature	634°C
Biochar Yield	33.33%
Wood Vinegar & Tar Yield	43.33%
Syngas Yield	23.33%

Download Test Report

EFB Fiber Biochar

Test Report of Biochar

Fixed Carbon	76.91%
Ash Content	17.14%
Volatiles	5.84%
Moisture	1.02%
High Calorific Value	6237 Kcal/kg
Low Calorific Value	6195 Kcal/kg

Download Test Report

Rice Husk Pyrolysis to Biochar Test on 2026-05-07

Rice Husk

Test Report of Experimental Process

Material Weight	180 g
Pyrolysis Time	3 hours 0 minutes
Maximum Pyrolysis Temperature	650°C
Biochar Yield	43.33%
Wood Vinegar & Tar Yield	34.44%
Syngas Yield	22.22%

Download Test Report

Rice Husk Biochar

Test Report of Biochar

Fixed Carbon	45.48%
Ash Content	45.51%
Volatiles	8.90%
Moisture	1.12%
High Calorific Value	4324 Kcal/kg
Low Calorific Value	4282 Kcal/kg

Download Test Report

Wood Chip Pyrolysis to Biochar Test on 2026-05-06

Wood

Test Report of Experimental Process

Material Weight	150 g
Pyrolysis Time	3 hours 49 minutes
Maximum Pyrolysis Temperature	631°C
Biochar Yield	30.67%
Wood Vinegar & Tar Yield	43.33%
Syngas Yield	26.00%

Download Test Report

Wood Biochar

Test Report of Biochar

Fixed Carbon	78.10%
Ash Content	13.16%
Volatiles	8.57%
Moisture	1.60%
High Calorific Value	6321 Kcal/kg
Low Calorific Value	6185 Kcal/kg

Download Test Report

Walnut Shell Pyrolysis to Biochar Test on 2026-04-26

Walnut Shell

Test Report of Experimental Process

Material Weight	150 g
Pyrolysis Time	2 hours 58 minutes
Maximum Pyrolysis Temperature	528°C
Biochar Yield	29.33%
Wood Vinegar & Tar Yield	39.33%
Syngas Yield	31.33%

Download Test Report

Walnut Shell Biochar

Test Report of Biochar

Fixed Carbon	87.47%
Ash Content	3.80%
Volatiles	8.65%
Moisture	0.82%
High Calorific Value	7519 Kcal/kg
Low Calorific Value	7456 Kcal/kg

Download Test Report

EFB Pellet Pyrolysis to Biochar Test on 2026-04-16

EFB Pellets

Test Report of Experimental Process

Material Weight	200 g
Pyrolysis Time	3 hours 10 minutes
Maximum Pyrolysis Temperature	488°C
Biochar Yield	28.50%
Wood Vinegar & Tar Yield	48.50%
Syngas Yield	23.00%

Download Test Report

EFB Pellets Biochar

Test Report of Biochar

Fixed Carbon	71.04%
Ash Content	12.02%
Volatiles	16.79%
Moisture	1.56%
High Calorific Value	6611 Kcal/kg
Low Calorific Value	6476 Kcal/kg

Download Test Report

The post Biomass Pyrolysis to Biochar Test Reports appeared first on Beston Group.